GC2K3. I find it hard to believe that it was just a few months ago a friend of mine, a pastor of a UMC church, asked about the Episcopal Church's
General Convention and I replied that I thought it would be a relatively quiet affair. Of course that was before New Hampshire nominated a man who had left his wife and children and was living with sex partner.
In preparation for the General Convention, the Theology Committee of the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church released a
report ("The Gift of Sexuality: A Theological Perspective") that, while not an endorsement of Biblical ethics and morality, at least recommended a "cooling off" period: "Because at this time we are nowhere near consensus in the Church regarding the blessing of homosexual relationships, we cannot recommend authorizing the development of new rites for such blessings."
Nevertheless, the Convention has the task of affirming or rejecting the Robinson nomination. Talking with a vestry member tonight (actually Friday night, I see by the time I post this it will be Saturday morning), he said he thought the Robinson nomination would be the first order of business and will set the pattern for the convention.
The Diocese of California has proposed a number of proposals,
one calling for "Rites for Blessing and Supporting Committed Relationships;"
another which attacks anyone who seeks deliverance from sexual bondage. Similarly, the Diocese of Newark has a
proposal which condemns by name the
American Anglican Council (AAC) for running a
campaign focusing on "God's Love Changed Me."